What we do know is that Meelo gets some focus and is seen with his father this time, getting the sort of individual focus that his elder siblings got in earlier episodes. Good to see that happening. Now, my predictions for tonight's show - positive and negative possibilities -
1. The episode's title itself - it's likely to be a dual reference to the things that kept Aang's household and children (and now grandchildren) at peace as well as to the United Republic forces and the President of the United Republic, all of whom are responsible for keeping peace between nations. It could also extent to the Avatar, whose job is to keep peace. I admit that the choice of episode title brings to mind The Hunger Games and the nasty Peacekeepers of Panem, who were the bad guys. Anyway....
2. President Raiko of the United Republic - It's been revealed that he either outright clashes with Korra or refuses to heed her call for help. There's a difference between the two. But seriously, is there any authority figure who doesn't clash with Korra who isn't evil? Why was it that antagonists like Tarrlok and Unalaq were so supportive of the Avatar at first, while she landed up clashing with good guys - Tenzin and Lin Beifong in the very first episode, and now Tenzin and Tonraq? It's a silly pattern.
Positive - The most positive way for the known outcome to go is to have the President suggest diplomatic rather than military action against the Northern Water Tribe knowing and telling Korra that the lives are at stake, and that he doesn't want to risk starting a war that kills United Republic soldiers for the sake of a family succession problem. A peaceful option makes more sense.
Neutral -President Raiko decides to avoid going into war with the Northern Water Tribe because he doesn't want to antagonize the waterbenders in his fleet, or all the Water Tribe people in the United Republic. He's more interested in keeping power and peace within the United Republic than having to deal with what's going on outside its borders, especially since this reflects on his status. While this makes him self-interested and somewhat boring, it makes complete sense, even if it's not in a positive manner as the first option.
Negative - The worst option is that President Raiko is siding with Unalaq over things unknown and would much rather have the political support of the powerful chieftain of the Northern Water Tribe than do his job. This is the most negative of the three options involved. It's not likely that we're going to find out that the President is cozying up to Unalaq this quickly, but if it comes in a later episode, it's going to be a downer. It would really waste President Raiko as a character.
Worse yet, the negative option would divide characters in the Avatar-verse into "those against Korra" and "those supporting Korra" and this sort of black-and-white divide really doesn't help. Unalaq has suffered going into the evil side of this divide in the previous episode, and to quickly set a character on the wrong side of this divide would be wrong. I would much rather see Raiko be right and Korra do something hotheaded and foolish (and unjustified) than have the bad guys justify Korra's lack of restraint.
3. Korra herself - There are three possible ways for her to go, just as with the President.
Positive - She accepts what the President says gracefully and understands what he means, but acts out of necessity to save her people.
Neutral - She understands what the President says, but does not take it too well and acts in a more forceful manner, taking things into her own hands. Alternatively, she acts forceful with a negative President.
Negative - She shows no restraint at all with the President even if the President behaves in a positive manner and forcefully takes things into her own hands - like threatening to feed Hotak to Naga, but worse.
4. Team Avatar - No idea how much further they can go, or what will happen with them and Varrick. I would love to see more Varrick shenanigans but what I don't want to see is....
5. Team Avatar getting into a tussle with Eska and Desna. Eska is behaving like a full-blown maniac and any encounter with her and Bolin is likely to turn into something murderous. The abusive relationship is not funny and hopefully Eska has either gone the wrong way or given up her mad chase. The most positive way to portray her would be to show her with Desna and being calmed down by her father. We don't know anything about her yet, so she seems like a generic psycho.
6. Unalaq -
Positive - Finding out that he actually has motivations beyond his greed for power, and that he really wants to do good in an extreme manner.
Neutral - Finding out that he has had trouble with his brother before and that Tonraq is somehow not entirely blameless for this incident, or discovering that his mind was poisoned by someone else.
Negative - Confirmation that he is every bit as bad as he looks, or is getting even worse.
7. This is not so much a prediction as much as it is a wish - I'm hoping to see Zuko either onscreen or getting a mention. Zuko has been traveling the world for the sake of peace and it would be great to see signs of him getting ready to support the next Avatar.
1. The episode's title itself - it's likely to be a dual reference to the things that kept Aang's household and children (and now grandchildren) at peace as well as to the United Republic forces and the President of the United Republic, all of whom are responsible for keeping peace between nations. It could also extent to the Avatar, whose job is to keep peace. I admit that the choice of episode title brings to mind The Hunger Games and the nasty Peacekeepers of Panem, who were the bad guys. Anyway....
2. President Raiko of the United Republic - It's been revealed that he either outright clashes with Korra or refuses to heed her call for help. There's a difference between the two. But seriously, is there any authority figure who doesn't clash with Korra who isn't evil? Why was it that antagonists like Tarrlok and Unalaq were so supportive of the Avatar at first, while she landed up clashing with good guys - Tenzin and Lin Beifong in the very first episode, and now Tenzin and Tonraq? It's a silly pattern.
Positive - The most positive way for the known outcome to go is to have the President suggest diplomatic rather than military action against the Northern Water Tribe knowing and telling Korra that the lives are at stake, and that he doesn't want to risk starting a war that kills United Republic soldiers for the sake of a family succession problem. A peaceful option makes more sense.
Neutral -President Raiko decides to avoid going into war with the Northern Water Tribe because he doesn't want to antagonize the waterbenders in his fleet, or all the Water Tribe people in the United Republic. He's more interested in keeping power and peace within the United Republic than having to deal with what's going on outside its borders, especially since this reflects on his status. While this makes him self-interested and somewhat boring, it makes complete sense, even if it's not in a positive manner as the first option.
Negative - The worst option is that President Raiko is siding with Unalaq over things unknown and would much rather have the political support of the powerful chieftain of the Northern Water Tribe than do his job. This is the most negative of the three options involved. It's not likely that we're going to find out that the President is cozying up to Unalaq this quickly, but if it comes in a later episode, it's going to be a downer. It would really waste President Raiko as a character.
Worse yet, the negative option would divide characters in the Avatar-verse into "those against Korra" and "those supporting Korra" and this sort of black-and-white divide really doesn't help. Unalaq has suffered going into the evil side of this divide in the previous episode, and to quickly set a character on the wrong side of this divide would be wrong. I would much rather see Raiko be right and Korra do something hotheaded and foolish (and unjustified) than have the bad guys justify Korra's lack of restraint.
3. Korra herself - There are three possible ways for her to go, just as with the President.
Positive - She accepts what the President says gracefully and understands what he means, but acts out of necessity to save her people.
Neutral - She understands what the President says, but does not take it too well and acts in a more forceful manner, taking things into her own hands. Alternatively, she acts forceful with a negative President.
Negative - She shows no restraint at all with the President even if the President behaves in a positive manner and forcefully takes things into her own hands - like threatening to feed Hotak to Naga, but worse.
4. Team Avatar - No idea how much further they can go, or what will happen with them and Varrick. I would love to see more Varrick shenanigans but what I don't want to see is....
5. Team Avatar getting into a tussle with Eska and Desna. Eska is behaving like a full-blown maniac and any encounter with her and Bolin is likely to turn into something murderous. The abusive relationship is not funny and hopefully Eska has either gone the wrong way or given up her mad chase. The most positive way to portray her would be to show her with Desna and being calmed down by her father. We don't know anything about her yet, so she seems like a generic psycho.
6. Unalaq -
Positive - Finding out that he actually has motivations beyond his greed for power, and that he really wants to do good in an extreme manner.
Neutral - Finding out that he has had trouble with his brother before and that Tonraq is somehow not entirely blameless for this incident, or discovering that his mind was poisoned by someone else.
Negative - Confirmation that he is every bit as bad as he looks, or is getting even worse.
7. This is not so much a prediction as much as it is a wish - I'm hoping to see Zuko either onscreen or getting a mention. Zuko has been traveling the world for the sake of peace and it would be great to see signs of him getting ready to support the next Avatar.
No comments:
Post a Comment